Agency workers once again banned from replacing striking workers.

  • Employment Law
Agency workers ban on replacing striking workers

Peninsula Group, HR and Health & Safety Experts

(Last updated )

The High Court has ruled that the government’s decision to repeal laws that banned employers from using agency workers to cover for staff who are on strike was unlawful.

In 2022, against the backdrop of industrial action in the rail sector and with other industrial action expected, the government decided to revoke regulation 7 of the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Business Regulations 2003 which prohibited agencies from providing temporary workers to replace individuals taking part in an official strike or official industrial action. Without any consultation, on 21 July 2022, the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses (Amendment) Regulations 2022 came into force which meant that agencies could then provide temporary workers to cover striking workers.

Thirteen trade unions applied for judicial review of the government’s decision as they argued that consultation should have taken place and that there had been a breach of the government’s duty to prevent unlawful interference with the rights of trade unions and their members.

The High Court found that the government had acted unlawfully, and they therefore quashed the Amendment Regulations. From the 10 August 2023 onwards, the law reverts to the position pre-July 2022, so agencies will again not be able to supply businesses with temporary workers to cover those employees who are on strike.

If the government remains determined to revoke regulation 7 of the Conduct Regulations, it can either consult as required and place new regulations before parliament, or appeal against the court’s judgment.

The Government indicated it was disappointed at the result and was considering its next move.

The impact of the return to the long-standing position could be minimal given that the right to supply temporary workers to replace striking workers was only in force for a year. Furthermore, employers would have had to consider whether using temporary workers in such circumstances was even right for their business given the training that would need to have been provided and the impact on employer relations.

Given this U-turn is a return to the previous position that was the law for many years, it will be familiar to businesses. Close attention however will need to be paid to this area to see what the Government do next to ensure that businesses stay within the law.

Related articles

  • More details released on parental leave changes in ERA 2025

    Blog

    More details released on parental leave changes in ERA 2025

    The Government has released details of the Statutory Instruments (SIs) that were laid in Parliament on Monday 12 January 2026, to implement measures on paternity leave and parental leave in the Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA 2025)

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Employment Law
  • Government backs down on mandatory digital IDs

    Blog

    Government backs down on mandatory digital IDs

    In September 2025, the Government announced that digital IDs would be introduced in the UK and that they would be mandatory in order for an individual to work in the UK

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Employment Law
  • How to Manage a Flexible Working Request

    Blog

    Work Foundation calls on employers to embrace flexible working options

    The Work Foundation at Lancaster University, a leading think tank, is urging employers to adopt flexible working arrangements in 2026 before changes to the flexible working system are implemented under the Employment Rights Act 2025 next year

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Employment Law
Try Brainbox for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and health & safety questions

Ask a question now
0800 158 2313Speak to an expert 24/7