Avoiding Damaging Dismissals Through the Use of Settlement Agreements

  • Conflict Management

Peninsula Group, HR and Health & Safety Experts

(Last updated )

Read our article: 'Avoiding Damaging Dismissals Through the Use of Settlement Agreements'. Contact us today for more information about our Employment Law, Health & Safety, and HR services.

"Can I have a Quiet Word?" Many of Peninsula’s clients believe that the procedures they have to follow to bring about an employee’s fair dismissal are laborious, stressful and time consuming.  Which is why the Government’s proposals for ‘confidential pre-termination negotiations’, that were introduced on Monday 29th July 2013, have been so widely welcomed. This is a very significant development. It introduces a new statutory framework that will allow certain discussions, between an employer and an employee, about an employee’s exit from the business, to be kept confidential from an Employment Tribunal, in the event that the employee subsequently brings a claim for unfair dismissal. Employers, who seek to use this new procedure, with Peninsula’s guidance and help, will be able to explore with one of their employees the idea of bringing their employment to an end, by agreement, in an open and frank discussion, without concern that this could be used against them in the event of a subsequent unfair dismissal claim.  There are, as one would expect, certain procedural safeguards, and employers will also need to follow the ACAS Code of Practice. Peninsula can readily advise employers about such matters. However, pre-termination negotiations will only be effective, and this ‘fast track’ will only work, in the event that an employer and an employee are able to agree the terms of an employee’s departure.  And once agreed, those terms will have to be set out in a Settlement Agreement (formerly known as a compromise agreement). But a Settlement Agreement is without doubt the best way of achieving a clean break between an employer and an employee:- It can resolve and prevent employment disputes.

Many of Peninsula’s clients often ask for guidance on the amount that should be paid to an employee, as part of these negotiations, in order to secure their exit from the business.  It is largely a commercial decision based on legal advice, but a number of factors are likely to be relevant:-

Best practice dictates that employers should, in this scenario, agree with the employee the termination date; calculate and agree their contractual entitlement up to that date (salary/benefits/holiday/PILON etc) and then agree a figure (and payment plan) to be paid on departure, in full and final settlement of any Employment Tribunal claims that an employee might be able to bring.  Inevitably there are certain legal requirements that employers must observe, and which Peninsula can advise on, when drawing up settlement agreements.  Significantly and most importantly of all, the employee must have received advice from an independent legal advisor before the agreement is concluded. And although Peninsula can provide advice to employers on the terms that should be included in Settlement Agreements, common clauses inevitably will include (1) obligations of confidentiality, (2) a no disparaging comments clause, (3) a warranty and (4) a clause confirming that the payment is accepted by the employee in full and final settlement of all outstanding Employment Tribunal claims. There are also tax implications that employers need to be mindful of.  As a general rule, all payments received by an employee under a Settlement Agreement will be taxable, either as employment income (payment up to termination; salary, holiday pay, PILON etc) or, as a termination payment in so far as it exceeds £30,000 (payment on termination). Unless it is being paid in settlement of a claim for injury to feelings. Whilst employers will need to think very carefully about the risks of engaging in these negotiations, and the impact it is likely to have on their on-going working relationship with an employee, particularly if agreement cannot be reached, this is undoubtedly an welcome development, given that Peninsula have first-hand experience when advising their clients, on just how damaging dismissals can be. By Mark Owen

FAQs

Got a question? Check whether we’ve already answered it for you…

Related articles

  • man and woman sat at desk having a meeting.

    Blog

    Acas report highlights prevalence of workplace conflict

    An independent report from Acas, titled How Prevalent is Individual Conflict at Work in Great Britain in 2025?, has found that over two in five working-age adults in Great Britain reported experiencing conflict in the last 12 months

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Conflict Management
  • Health and Safety Advice for Managing Workplace Theft in Alberta

    Blog

    Employee unfairly dismissed for chewing gum "theft"

    In the case of Moraru v Boohoo.com UK Ltd, the Employment Tribunal had to consider whether an employee was unfairly dismissed after taking and eating chewing gum intended as a free gift for client orders.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Conflict Management
  • tax bill settled

    Blog

    Holly Willoughby's company settles £377k tax bill

    TV presenter Holly Willoughby did not turn up at the High Court for a hearing on whether to wind up her jointly owned Roxy Media over unpaid tax bills.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team
    • Conflict Management
Try BRAINBOX+ for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and Health & Safety questions

Ask a question now
0800 158 2313Speak to an expert 24/7