No longer holding the necessary qualifications to undertake a job, where possession of those qualifications is a legal requirement, is a potentially fair reason for dismissal. If this employee cannot perform his job without driving and you dismissed him for this reason, then there is a good chance that the tribunal would find that the dismissal was not unfair. In some cases dismissal in this circumstance may be inevitable.

However, although the employee would be contravening a legal requirement if he were to continue driving in his current job, this will not automatically warrant dismissal because there may be adjustments that you could make which would mean that the employee would still have an effective role in the organisation.

Because the main duty of the employee’s job is his consultancy services and not the driving, there may well be alternative arrangements that can be agreed upon for the duration of the driving ban. Consider how integral driving actually is to the job. The outcome of this will certainly be different for someone whose job was as a driver, a taxi driver for example, as opposed to someone who occasionally needs to use a car to reach an alternative work location. Each job will be different in this respect so individual consideration needs to be given to whether it is possible for the employee to make efficient use of alternative transport instead of using his car. The employee could still perform his job role – he has not been banned from providing consultancy services after all.

The length of the driving ban would also be influential because using public transport may well be practical in the short term but less so in the long time.

Whilst there is no specific requirement on you to look for alternative work for the employee whilst he serves his ban, it may be productive to do so. If the employee is a good worker who you would not normally have had any problems with but for the ban, it may be counter productive to dismiss him because you will have lost a hardworking employee.

Consider, for example, whether another employee would be willing to undertake a job swap whilst the employee is banned from driving. If this can be arranged, both employees must be clear that the arrangement is temporary and both will revert back to their normal job once the ban has been lifted.

Ultimately, if it is not practical for you to retain the employee, then you should dismiss him with notice. You should still follow a fair disciplinary procedure, including inviting him to a hearing and allowing him to be accompanied, together with the right of appeal.

Making attempts to preserve the employee’s employment if this is practical, even though they may fail, will help show that it was a reasonable response in the circumstances to eventually dismiss the employee.

For any further information, please call our 24 Hour Advice Service on 0844 892 2772

  • Home

  • Resources

  • Blogs

  • Ask The HR Expert: A field consultant of mine was caught speeding and has now accumulated maximum points thus cannot drive anymore, what action can I take against him?

Ask The HR Expert: A field consultant of mine was caught speeding and has now accumulated maximum points thus cannot drive anymore, what action can I take against him?

  • Employment Law
Peninsula Group

Peninsula Group, HR and Health & Safety Experts

(Last updated )

Please Note: This content is accurate on the date of publishing

Related articles

  • legislation

    Blog

    Various provisions included in the Employment Rights Act 2025 will need secondary legislation to bring them fully into force. To proceed, the Government has launched two consultations, applying to England, Scotland and Wales, to seek comments on the details in two specific areas.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team
    • Employment Law
  • Peninsula Group Limited - An employer exploring a data breach

    Blog

    The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, led her Spring Statement in Parliament with four proud statements: inflation is down, borrowing is down, living standards are up and the economy is growing.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team
    • Employment Law
  • era25

    Blog

    Among the important changes, dismissal for taking part in protected industrial action is now “automatically unfair”, removing the previous 12-week limit for claiming unfair dismissal and extending it through the whole period of industrial action.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Group HR and Health & Safety Experts
    • Employment Law
Back to resource hub
Brainbox AI Logo

Created by experts, powered by AI Icon

HR and H&S advice to the next level!

Our enhanced Brainbox AI Logo AI solution...

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest news & tips that matter most to your business in our monthly newsletter.