HMRC refuses to stand down on £470k giant marshmallows case

  • Employment Tribunal
tribunal

Peninsula Team,

(Last updated )

After losing a £470,000 VAT case at the Upper Tribunal over whether giant marshmallows are confectionery, HMRC is taking the fight to the Court of Appeal

Giant marshmallow manufacturer, Innovative Bites, has been on the mind of HMRC for quite some time and it will not be dropping the case after losing out at both the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) and the Upper Tribunal. 

HMRC has now been given the go-ahead to take the dispute to the Court of Appeal although a date has not been set for the hearing.

Both tribunals found the consumable was not a confectionary item as it was intended to be roasted over a fire, therefore making it exempt from the usual 20% VAT. 

The placement in supermarkets also came into question, as they were mostly sold on a seasonal basis within the barbeque section.

What training is needed for food safety?

Get instant, expert answers to your HR questions...

Ask Brainbox
0800 158 2313Speak to an expert 24/7

HMRC did not feel this way, issuing demands for VAT amounting to £472,928 in for 2015 to 2019.

Glyn Edwards, VAT Director at MHA said: ‘We all thought this was the end of the giant marshmallows tax debate, but HMRC have decided to appeal again in the hope of finally persuading the tax authorities that size isn’t everything. 

‘More seriously the general public might question whether this is the best use of taxpayer’s money when we all know that making any sense of the VAT dividing lines on food has defeated the best legal minds for decades.’

Visit BrAInbox today where you can find answers to questions like Is it a legal requirement to wear a beard net in a food business?

Related articles

  • What do Employment Tribunal Procedures Cover?

    Blog

    ET fees will not return, says Justice Secretary

    Following reports that the Government was on the verge of reintroducing employment tribunal (ET) fees, the Justice Secretary and Deputy Prime Minister, David Lammy, has confirmed that this will not happen.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team
    • Employment Tribunal
  • unfair dismissal

    Blog

    Employee unfairly dismissed for shopping at work

    In the case of Lanuszka v Accountancy MK Services Ltd, the Employment Tribunal had to consider whether the alleged misconduct was the real reason for the dismissal.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team
    • Dismissal
  • dismissal

    Blog

    Director constructively dismissed after being told to “shut up”

    In the case of Ashe v Claims Equilibrium Club Ltd, the Employment Tribunal had to consider whether a director was constructively dismissed following a breakdown in the relationship between them and a fellow director.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Dismissal

Try Brainbox for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and health & safety questions

Ask a question now
0800 158 2313Speak to an expert 24/7