Important employment law cases from 2016

  • Employment Law
Follow us on Twitter

Peninsula Group, HR and Health & Safety Experts

(Last updated )

Aslam and others v Uber BV and others

Although only an employment tribunal decision, this was the highest publicised case of the year. The decision of the tribunal that Uber drivers are not self-employed but are workers entitles them to worker employment rights including minimum wage, working time rights and paid holiday. The judgment scrutinised the relationship between Uber and their drivers based on how it operated in reality, rather than how it was described in documents. Reports suggest that another 25 drivers are planning to bring claims against Uber to gain worker rights whilst Uber have announced they have lodged an appeal against the decision.

British Gas Trading Ltd v Lock and another

The Court of Appeal agreed with earlier decisions in this case and held that commission should be included in holiday pay. The decision covers ‘individual results based commission’ so includes payments such as a target bonus which is related to the individual’s results during a particular period. As with the other holiday pay decisions, the decision relates to the 4 weeks of annual leave provided by the Working Time Directive only. British Gas is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court. There are still some technical grey areas including the correct calculating reference period when commission schemes pay out on an infrequent basis and which holidays come first in the holiday year, though the Employment Appeal Tribunal commented earlier that it is logical to take the four weeks leave first.

G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Ltd v Powell

It was previously though that pay protection was not a requirement under the duty to make reasonable adjustments, however, Powell decided that long term pay protection can be a reasonable adjustment to enable the employee to remain or return to work. In this case, the disabled employee was moved to a lower role but maintained their previous higher salary. Around a year later, the employer attempted to reduce the pay to the amount normally paid in that role. The Employment Appeal Tribunal commented that, although it will not be an everyday conclusion, having to make up pay on a long term basis can be a reasonable adjustment, though the financial considerations will have to be weighed in balance by the employer. Reasonable adjustments may require employers to treat the employee more favourably than others in regards to future pay.

Peninsula Business Services Ltd v Donaldson

As the use of childcare voucher schemes expand, this case provided helpful clarification on what happens when the recipient goes on maternity leave. This particular scheme deducted the employee’s salary in return for childcare vouchers but required joining employees to agree to suspend their membership of the scheme during maternity leave. The employee claimed this was discriminatory. The Employment Appeal Tribunal judged that schemes which deduct salary and convert them to benefits do not have to continue to be paid for by the employer during maternity leave as this will provide a windfall for the employer. The suspension of the vouchers during maternity leave was not discriminatory. Schemes which provide childcare vouchers in addition to normal salary will have to be provided by the employer during maternity leave.

Related articles

  • Blog

    Minister hints at roadmap for Employment Rights Bill

    Employment rights minister indicates there will be a roadmap for employment law overhaul and introduction of first day rights, not an immediate rollout of all measures

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Employment Rights Bill
  • Blog

    Over 500 employers named and shamed for failing to pay minimum wage

    The Government recently published a list of 518 businesses who had failed to pay their workers at the national minimum wage between 2015 and 2022.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Employment Law
  • Blog

    Supporting employees affected by the menopause

    Not only is the Employment Rights Bill – which contains proposed reforms on supporting menopause in the workplace - moving at pace, but last month, industry leaders came together to form the first-ever independent Menopause Advisory Group. The group aims to boost workplace support for women affected by the menopause and is another step in the Government’s aim to break down barriers to work as part of their Plan for Change.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Employment Law

Try Brainbox for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and Health & Safety questions

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest news & tips that matter most to your business in our monthly newsletter.