0800 158 2313Speak to an expert 24/7

In the case of Mr M Palanki v The Big Table Group, the judge ruled that money received by employees as tips must be included in holiday pay.

This is a first instance decision which means it is not binding on other cases, even those with the same circumstances. However, it does give insight into how a tribunal would assess similar cases and employers should consider their position if they operate in a similar way. It also offers a reminder to check on the specific arrangements for the tronc to ensure that it does not inadvertently increase your risk of breaching the law.

The claimant was employed as front of house staff for the respondent and received hourly pay alongside tips via a tronc system.

There was no contractual entitlement to guaranteed tips, but there was a contractual entitlement to receive whatever amount the tronc policy determined in any given week.

There was a ‘troncmaster’ who had control over the allocation and distribution of tips, however, there was no separate bank account for the tronc. The troncmaster did not operate her own bank account, HMRC had not been notified of her position as troncmaster and no separate PAYE scheme had been set up in her name. Tips were paid through the same payroll system as normal wages.

Because of this, the Judge found that the payments were made “by the employer to the employee”. They also found the tips were “intrinsically linked to the performance of tasks which are required to be carried out under the contract of employment”.

Therefore, the tips counted towards the claimant’s “normal pay” and, as such, must be included when calculating holiday pay.

Tips paid via a troncmaster through a separate payroll as not considered to be paid “by the employer to the employee”.

  • Home

  • Resources

  • Blogs

  • Tips paid through mis-directed tronc system must be included in holiday pay

Tips paid through mis-directed tronc system must be included in holiday pay

tips
  • Pay & Benefits
Peninsula Team

Peninsula Team,

(Last updated )

Please Note: This content is accurate on the date of publishing

Related articles

  • pay

    Blog

    In Thandi and others v Next plc, it was found that market forces can be enough to justify indirectly discriminatory pay practices — employers are not bound to uplift pay of a group to which the same recruitment and retention pressures do not apply.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Pay & Benefits
  • wage

    Blog

    The first ‘naming and shaming’ list since the Fair Work Agency (FWA) took over the enforcement of the national minimum wage has been released.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Pay & Benefits
  • unpaid

    Blog

    The Government has launched a consultation on strengthening employment rights for unpaid carers and parents of seriously ill children. As part of its Plan to Make Work Pay and Next Steps to Make Work Pay the Government committed to review the implementation of Carer’s Leave and consider whether there is a need to change the current entitlement introduced by the previous government under the Carer’s Leave Act 2023. Subsequently, in November 2025 the Department for Business and Trade published the terms of reference for the Government’s review of Carer’s Leave and employment rights for unpaid carers.

    Peninsula Logo
    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • Business Management
    • + 1
Back to resource hub
Brainbox AI Logo

Created by experts, powered byAI Icon

HR and H&S advice to the next level!

Our enhancedBrainbox AI LogoAI solution...

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest news & tips that matter most to your business in our monthly newsletter.