"It was just banter... a bit of a joke!"

  • Employee Conduct
Peninsula Logo

Peninsula Group, HR and Health & Safety Experts

(Last updated )

Read our article: '"It was just banter... a bit of a joke!"'. Contact us today for more information about our Employment Law, Health & Safety, and HR services.

The dreaded B-word. People use it all the time. You might even use it yourself. In its original sense, banter is completely fine. After all, who doesn’t enjoy some innocent, light-hearted teasing and joking with friends and colleagues? But in recent years, the word banter has taken on a somewhat darker use. Defending the indefensible Banter is often the first defence someone utters if they’re accused of bullying, being overly aggressive, or even taking part in unwanted sexual behaviour. It implies that the accused has done nothing wrong, and it’s the victim’s fault for being over-sensitive to what was merely a bit of ‘fun’. That’s dangerous. Especially in the workplace, because it’s a defence for misconduct. And it’s why so many employers have their purses emptied and reputations ruined at tribunals. A recent ‘banter’ case Early in October 2017, Lisa Vickers, a factory worker from Ashton-under-Lyne, won £10,000 in compensation after her manager wrote a lewd comment in her 40th birthday card, humiliating her. The manager subjected many of the workers to daily comments of a sexual nature, though Vickers described him as aiming an ongoing campaign at her in particular. When Vickers saw the birthday card comment, it was the final straw. So she took the employer to an employment tribunal. He defended his comments in the manner you might expect: he blamed banter. Not only that, he said Vickers actually joined in with it. The tactic didn’t work, and she successfully claimed sexual harassment and won huge damages for injury to feelings. Employers are at risk As an employer, you are responsible for your employees’ conduct. And if someone’s proven to cause harm to another employee in the name of banter, you can be liable for it. This is called ‘vicarious liability’, and it means that you should seek to limit or prohibit banter (or behaviour that crosses the line) at work. How to limit banter

  • Reducing offensive, ‘jokey’ behaviour is hard. Policing it even more so. As a minimum, make clear rules on what is and isn’t acceptable to say at work.
  • Give all staff and managers training on the rules.
  • If you have a zero tolerance policy on such behaviour, enforce it. Don’t treat two separate, similar acts differently and take disciplinary action when necessary.
  • Explain which events outside of work are linked to your staff’s employment and remind them that company rules continue to apply during those times. Examples include working lunches, client meetings, work-organised social events and company away days.
  • Ensure your equality and diversity training prohibits jokes about protected characteristics such as age, sexual orientation and so on.
  • Investigate all staff reports of misconduct and impose disciplinary sanctions to deter any other employees from engaging in such behaviour.
  • Set clear rules about ‘banter’ in written communication, and have an email policy that prohibits emails, notes and letters containing inappropriate messages.


Got a question? Check whether we’ve already answered it for you…

Related articles

  • equality for older workers


    General Election 2024: political parties urged to give older workers equal opportunities

    According to new analysis by the Centre for Ageing Better (CAB), the next government could boost the economy by as much as £9 billion a year if it gave older workers a fairer deal in the labour market.

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Equality & Diversity
  • safety failings


    Drowning death sees BAM Nuttall fined £2m

    Construction company BAM Nuttall Ltd has been fined more than £2m following the death of a worker who drowned whilst working on their flood defence project in Leeds.

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Grievance
  • compensation pay


    Directors involved in BHS collapse must pay £18.3m in compensation

    The High Court has ruled that two directors of collapsed retailer BHS must pay £18,364,448 in compensation to creditors to stop corporate risk-taking

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Dispute Resolution
Back to resource hub

Try Brainbox for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and Health & Safety questions

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest news & tips that matter most to your business in our monthly newsletter.