Can social media remarks be classed as gross misconduct?

  • Employee Conduct
Peninsula Logo

Peninsula Group, HR and Health & Safety Experts

(Last updated )

Read our article: 'Can social media remarks be classed as gross misconduct?'. Contact us today for more information about our Employment Law, Health & Safety, and HR services.

Social media is an area where employers can jump straight to dismissal once they’ve been informed that an offensive remark has been published online. However, this is a difficult area with many challenges surrounding it, and can bring rise to expensive tribunal claims if employees are unfairly dismissed.   The first issue for employers is to determine what online behaviour they’ll class as gross misconduct. This can differ from business to business, depending on, among other factors, the importance of online reputation to the business. Most rules on online conduct will consider defamation and breaches of confidentiality gross misconduct, but there’s a grey area concerning offensive employee communications that do not relate to the business, but are, nonetheless, posted online. Any social media remarks that are deemed to constitute gross misconduct by the business should be outlined in a social media policy. Social media policies The importance of a clear policy outlining rules on social media activity has been highlighted by tribunals in a number of gross misconduct cases. An Employment Appeal Tribunal ruling found that where a policy prohibited any action which might embarrass the company, this allowed the employer to fairly dismiss the employee for gross misconduct should they be found to have posted such comments on social media. Simply having a policy may not be enough to prove the employee was aware of their online rights and responsibilities. With this in mind, employers should also ensure they provide training on this issue and receive a signed notice stating that the employee has read and understood the social media policy. Assessing effects Tribunals have also highlighted that when determining whether remarks are gross misconduct or not, employers should not only focus on what is actually said, but must look to see if any of the following are adversely affected:

  • The business
  • Other employees
  • Customers

This will require employers to examine each individual breach of the social media policy and determine the likely consequences of each breach separately. Where the employer is unable to show that the online remarks have negatively affected the business in any way, it’s unlikely that it will be fair to class this as gross misconduct. When deciding whether social media remarks can be classed as gross misconduct, other factors that can also be taken in to account include:

  • The nature and seriousness of the comments made
  • The subject matter of the comments
  • The damage to the employer’s reputation
  • How and when the comments were made online
  • Any mitigating factors


Got a question? Check whether we’ve already answered it for you…

Related articles

  • hmrc legal fees settled


    Emile Heskey settles £195k HMRC legal fees

    A long-running tax case worth £1.63m with the former Liverpool and England footballer has concluded with HMRC set to receive £194,794.42 in legal fees

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Dispute Resolution
  • four colleagues having a discussion


    Let's talk politics (or not): what to do if a debate breaks out at work

    Political debates... to ban or not to ban? That is the question. If your staff break into a political debate at work, do you intervene? Or do you let them get on with it?

    Kate PalmerHR Advice and Consultancy Director
    • Dispute Resolution
  • neurodiversity


    Top tips to support neurodiverse applicants

    Embracing neurodiversity can give businesses a competitive advantage. This is because neurodivergence is associated with higher levels of innovation, creative thinking, lateral thinking, highly specialised skills, and the ability to analyse strategically. For this reason, and because neurodivergence can meet the definition of a disability under the Equality Act 2010, it is important that employers support neurodivergent candidates through the recruitment process.

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Equality & Diversity
Back to resource hub

Try Brainbox for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and Health & Safety questions

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest news & tips that matter most to your business in our monthly newsletter.