HMRC refuses to stand down on £470k giant marshmallows case

  • Employment Tribunal
tribunal
Peninsula Logo

Peninsula Team, Peninsula Team

(Last updated )

After losing a £470,000 VAT case at the Upper Tribunal over whether giant marshmallows are confectionery, HMRC is taking the fight to the Court of Appeal

Giant marshmallow manufacturer, Innovative Bites, has been on the mind of HMRC for quite some time and it will not be dropping the case after losing out at both the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) and the Upper Tribunal. 

HMRC has now been given the go-ahead to take the dispute to the Court of Appeal although a date has not been set for the hearing.

Both tribunals found the consumable was not a confectionary item as it was intended to be roasted over a fire, therefore making it exempt from the usual 20% VAT. 

The placement in supermarkets also came into question, as they were mostly sold on a seasonal basis within the barbeque section.

HMRC did not feel this way, issuing demands for VAT amounting to £472,928 in for 2015 to 2019.

Glyn Edwards, VAT Director at MHA said: ‘We all thought this was the end of the giant marshmallows tax debate, but HMRC have decided to appeal again in the hope of finally persuading the tax authorities that size isn’t everything. 

‘More seriously the general public might question whether this is the best use of taxpayer’s money when we all know that making any sense of the VAT dividing lines on food has defeated the best legal minds for decades.’

Visit BrAInbox today where you can find answers to questions like Is it a legal requirement to wear a beard net in a food business?

Related articles

  • tax

    Blog

    HMRC warns of exploitation of workplace nursery tax rules

    HMRC has issued a reminder to employers to ensure that they meet the rules on workplace nurseries to avoid exploiting the tax break

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Pay & Benefits
  • covid annual leave carry-over

    Blog

    ET failed to apply correct test when considering carry-over of annual leave during Covid

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), in the case of Knight v Off Broadway Ltd, had to consider if the Employment Tribunal (ET) had correctly approached the question of whether the claimant could have taken annual leave in the year it was accrued or if, because of Covid, it was not reasonably practicable

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • HR Policies Documentation
  • tribunal claim

    Blog

    Case Law Round-up

    We have seen a couple of cases recently where a job applicant has brought a tribunal claim after their offer of employment has been withdrawn. Let’s take a closer look at what happened and what the tribunal said

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Employment Tribunal
Back to resource hub

Try Brainbox for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and health & safety questions

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest news & tips that matter most to your business in our monthly newsletter.