Asda: Save money. Live better?

  • Equality & Diversity
Peninsula Logo

Peninsula Group, HR and Health & Safety Experts

(Last updated )

Read our article: 'Asda: Save money. Live better?'. Contact us today for more information about our Employment Law, Health & Safety, and HR services.

Asda’s mission statement, Save Money, Live Better, took on a new meaning after 9500+ female employees' claim that the supermarket giant is in breach of equal pay laws. The argument Most of the female claimants work in-store on checkouts or stacking shelves. They’re arguing for the same rate of pay as employees in the male-dominated Asda distribution centres, who earn £1-£3 more per hour. In addition, they argue that their gender is the only clear reason that Asda pays them less. If found true, it breaches the Equality Act 2010 because it’s unlawful for men and women doing the same job to get different pay. The same job The male employees at the distribution centres do have a different role to their female counterparts; serving customers is far different to supplying stock on time to stores. But this doesn’t defeat the pay argument. Males and females can do different jobs that are still comparable enough to get equal pay. To do so, the roles fall into one of three categories:

  • Like work: The same, or broadly similar, work where any differences aren’t of practical importance.
  • Work rated as equivalent: Work that could be different in nature, but a job evaluation scheme rated as being of equal value.
  • Work of equal value: Different work but of equal value in terms of factors like effort, skill and decision-making.

While the female claimants accept that their roles are different, they argue that they’re work of equal value and should get equal pay. Recent developments A recent preliminary hearing in the Manchester Employment Tribunal decided that both workers are an appropriate comparison, so the claim can advance. This is important because the claimants must be able to point to a real life person of the opposite sex who earns more than them. Asda’s defence At first, Asda tried to quash the claim. It announced that stores and distribution centres in different locations had different discretionary pay rates, but the Tribunal didn’t agree. To defend the claim, Asda has to show there’s a material factor that explains pay differences aren’t due to gender. Need equal pay advice? Please call the Peninsula 24-hour advice line today.

FAQs

Got a question? Check whether we’ve already answered it for you…

Related articles

  • directors banned

    Blog

    830 directors banned for cheating on Covid loans

    Nearly two thirds of all director bans last year were related to misconduct and fraud related to Covid loans although most avoided criminal prosecution

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Disciplinary
  • sexual harassment guidance

    Blog

    Sexual Harassment - update to EHRC technical guidance now out for consultation

    Ahead of the new preventative duty on employers taking effect from 26 October 2024, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has updated its technical guidance and put it out, in draft form, for consultation. The consultation will run until 6 August 2024, and we expect the finalised version of the technical guidance to be released in September 2024. Here, we look at what the new preventative duty is and what the draft technical guidance says.

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Disciplinary
  • Third Party Harassment

    Blog

    Case Law round-up

    Harassment can occur in a wide range of situations, even when there is no intention to cause any offence. Here are some interesting cases involving claims for harassment.

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Disciplinary
Back to resource hub

Try Brainbox for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and Health & Safety questions

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest news & tips that matter most to your business in our monthly newsletter.