Reducing staff hours: an alternative to redundancies?

  • Redundancy
Peninsula Logo

Peninsula Group, HR and Health & Safety Experts

(Last updated )

Taking a hard-working employee aside to tell them that their job’s at risk might be the toughest task you face as an employer.

But there are ways you can avoid it.

Revamping staff roles. Withdrawing job offers. Changing terms & conditions. We’ve explored these steps and more in an earlier article on how to cut staff costs without making redundancies.

But today, I’m going to focus on how reducing staff hours can help you trim your expenses and retain your workforce, ready for when business picks up again.

Let’s get started.

What are reduced hours?

Reducing staff hours means asking your employee/s to work fewer hours so you can pay them fewer wages and save money for your business.

It sounds simple. But there’s a lot you need to do before you can make any changes.

First, you need to have a good business reason for cutting people’s hours. Examples could be:

  • Reduced demand for the business’s product or service
  • A change in work duties
  • Earlier/later working hours
  • A local lockdown due to COVID-19

Then, you need to work out whether your employees’ contracts allow you to reduce the hours that they work.

If they do, you should still follow a careful process and consult your staff before you cut their hours.

But if they don’t, you’ll need to revise the contracts and ask your workforce to agree to the changes…

How do I change an employment contract?

As a general rule, you can only make changes to someone’s contract if:

  • Your employee agrees to the change
  • A representative of the employee agrees to the change on their behalf

It’s best to hold a consultation with your employee if you need them to agree.

This can just be an informal, one-on-one meeting, where you explain your reasons for the change and consider the employee’s ideas and concerns.

Some contract changes can be agreed verbally by the employee or their representatives. But even after a verbal agreement, you should confirm the change in writing.

Changes to terms within a written statement of main terms must be confirmed in writing within a month of the change, and you should consider whether you need to re-issue a new statement of main terms under the Good Work Plan rules.

This way, you’ll also have proof of the agreement to prevent any mix-ups and help protect you if you face a dispute.

But what happens if your employee won’t agree?

Can I force the changes upon my staff?

If the alternative is redundancy, your employees will likely settle for fewer hours.

But if not, you might still be able to force through the changes. This involves dismissing and then rehiring a worker under a new contract containing the reduced hours.

Forcing changes should be a last resort, and you need to consider:

  • Whether you’ve already tried everything to reach an agreement with the employee
  • If the changes are crucial for your business
  • The potential harm to staff morale and productivity
  • The risks of legal action

Workers who face forced changes might be able to claim unfair dismissal at an employment tribunal.

So if you’re thinking about dismissing and rehiring your staff, it’s worth getting expert legal advice to make sure it’s the right choice.

You might find that reducing the size of your workforce is a better option…

What if I still need to let staff go?

You should only look at job losses once you’ve explored all the alternatives. And like forcing contract changes, the road to redundancies is tough and riddled with risks.

Peninsula write you a watertight business case. They remove any costly legal risks. And they even handle those tough employee chats, so you don’t have to.

Book your free consultation now on 0800 028 2420


Got a question? Check whether we’ve already answered it for you…

Related articles

  • a man and woman in supermarket uniform


    Employee unfairly dismissed for interfering with food use-by-dates

    The Employment Tribunal (ET), in the case of Ms R Lino v EG Group Limited, were tasked with deciding whether or not the claimant, who crossed out the use-by-dates on food was unfairly dismissed.

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Dismissal
  • Staff Turnover


    Move over Great Resignation, it’s time for the Big Stay

    "The Great Resignation" has given way to "The Big Stay”, says the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)

    Peninsula Team Peninsula Team
    • End of Employment
  • Dismissal


    Employer fails to consider employee's disability before dismissal

    The Employment Tribunal (ET), in the case of Muir v Astra Zeneca UK Ltd, had to decide whether the respondent had fully considered the claimant’s disability and the effect it had before taking the decision to dismiss.

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Dismissal
Back to resource hub

Try Brainbox for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and Health & Safety questions

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest news & tips that matter most to your business in our monthly newsletter.